• Home
  • Our Team
    • About Chris Thornton
    • About the Psychologists
    • Consulting to The Redleaf Practice >
      • A/Prof Sloane Madden
      • Dr Sheeny Shanker-Butler
  • Join Our Team
  • Eating Disorders
    • Anorexia Nervosa
    • Bulimia Nervosa
    • Binge Eating Disorder
    • Treatment >
      • Family Based Treatment
      • Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
    • Resources >
      • Resources for Parents/Carers
      • Resources for Clients
      • Client Forms
  • Psychology FAQs
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  Welcome to The Redleaf Practice
(02) 9487 7799

Guest Blog Post - Is weight recovery enough?

7/6/2018

1 Comment

 
Picture
Dr Mandy Goldstein
We are excited to have another guest blog post today. Dr Mandy Goldstein is a clinical psychologist with 10 years’ experience in the treatment of eating disorders and trauma, across inpatient and outpatient settings. She is the Principal Clinical Psychologist at Mandy Goldstein Psychology, and works as an Associate at The Redleaf Practice. Mandy completed her Doctorate in Clinical Psychology at Macquarie University, where her research was focused on enhancing the treatment of eating disorders. She has a particular interest in both the use of evidence based treatment, and its dissemination beyond research environments, making effective treatment more accessible to clinicians and patients alike.

Is weight recovery enough?
​​​A recent article in the Journal of Eating Disorders by Murray, Loeb and Le Grange (2018) has made a call to change the way we investigate or report on change following treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN). The article, titled 'Treatment outcome reporting in anorexia nervosa: time for a paradigm shift?' and found here, raises the debate about whether weight restoration alone is enough to draw the conclusion someone with an eating disorder (ED) has recovered. 

Patients with AN typically restrict weight, and experience various symptoms associated with, or exacerbated by, what we now know to be part of a syndrome of starvation. These can include an increasingly obsessive focus on food to the exclusion of other aspects of life, rigidness in thinking, and difficulty seeing the big picture or having the flexibility to behave differently when the situation calls for it. Patients can experience increased irritability, even leading to significant mood difficulties, such as depression or anxiety, which might not have been there before becoming underweight. Starvation and underweight can also put sufferers at risk of increased psychological and serious medical difficulties. It’s no surprise then, that most clinicians working with people with AN agree, that reversing starvation must be the first aim of treatment. But is that enough to consider a patient recovered? The article suggests, no. As the authors point out, if we consider weight restoration alone as an outcome, we stand to neglect core cognitive and body image related aspects of the illness, and if we are not focusing on these as measures of good treatment outcome, we stand to miss treating these parts of the illness. The numbers don’t stack up either. An apparent “good outcome” of around 60% of patients being considered “recovered” based on weight restoration alone, falls quickly to a much lower percentage (40%), when a broader definition of recovery, including reduced disordered thoughts and feelings related to the ED, is used. This fits with our clinical experience in that, while not true for every case, it is not uncommon for weight restoration to mark the very beginning, rather than the end, of a treatment journey. It makes good sense that once out of starvation, patients are able to think more flexibly and clearly, as well as having more access to their feelings. It is often only once weight is restored, that sufferers are more ready, and have the tools available, to embark on the journey of addressing their thoughts, feelings and body image concerns stemming from the ED and often responsible for keeping it going.  

So if weight as an outcome from treatment is not enough, what might be? Some have bundled descriptions of weight and cognitive recovery into a united category, describing whether the patient has made a good, intermediary or poor outcome. But again, as the authors point out, this kind of reporting means we lose focus on the specific contribution that each patient’s weight and cognitive difficulties might make to their ED and makes it tough to provide more targeted treatments to each individual. Not surprisingly, another issue that springs from the confusion about how we report outcomes for EDs, is that there has not been a lot of agreement about this in the research field, leading to difficulties comparing different pieces of research to understand how effective treatments really are. The paper therefore calls for weight restoration and cognitive markers of recovery to be considered distinct entities, measured separately, and reported as independent indices, each contributing to a mark of recovery. That way, clinicians may have the opportunity to focus on specific targets of treatment for each of their clients; and researchers might be better able to compare the results of treatments they are investigating. Interestingly, say the authors, making this shift in how we report on treatment outcome, stands to impact how we use research to influence the development of new, more targetted treatments for AN, the importance of which is likely a whole other blog topic.

We’d love to get your thoughts. Please comment below. 

1 Comment
Chris
21/6/2018 07:41:32 am

In the case of anorexia nervosa, it is obvious that weight restoration alone is not enough. You also need to change eating behaviors. If you both 1. increase your weight and 2. restore your normalized patterns of behavior, you are recovered. Parents know this. Most psychotherapists, unfortunately, don't. That's one reason why professional psychotherapists have produced such poor results in treating AN, and why they can't even agree on what they are trying to accomplish, as shown by the Murray, Loeb, and Le Grange paper.
Moreover, most professionals set target weights too low. By allowing sufferers to remain in a partially starved state, they unwittingly allow the anxiety, depression, and rigidity associated with starvation to continue. To recover from AN the person, therefore, needs to not only return to pre-AN weight, she needs to exceed it, typically by a lot. Most kids need to exceed their pre-AN weight by roughly 20 pounds in order for their starved brains to heal. All the talk therapy in the world will not eliminate anxiety, depression, or rigidity if the brain is even partially starved. Talk therapies when the brain is starved amount to little more than psychobabble.
My comments are based on 13 years of experience interviewing parents of kids who have fully recovered from AN. In my opinion, it is parents, not the professionals, who are the true experts in this field. Based on my experience, when parents ignore professional psychotherapists and rely, instead, on their own common sense, they are achieving full recovery for their kids 80% -90% of the time. On the other hand, when parents defer to professional psychotherapists to design the treatment, rates of recovery fall to about 11% -- 40%, as shown in the clinical trials conducted by professionals, many of which have been cited on this blog.
You asked your readers for their thoughts, so I'm giving them to you.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Chris Thornton is a Clinical Psychologist and the Clinical Director of The Redleaf Practice, a specialist outpatient clinic for the treatment of eating disorders.  He is interested in bringing elements of positive psychology, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Acceptance and Mindfulness approaches to the treatment of eating disorders.   

    Picture

    Archives

    April 2019
    June 2018
    May 2018
    November 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011

    Categories

    All
    Act
    Adolescent
    Anorexia
    Anorexia Nervosa
    Anosognisia
    Bed Shortage
    Better Access
    Bulimia
    CBT Treatment Of Anorexia Adults. SWAN
    Clinician Alliance
    Depression
    Eating Disorders
    Evidence Based Treatment
    Families
    Ipt
    Maudsley Family Based Therapy
    Mfbt
    Mfbt Anorexia Adolescent Maudsley
    Mindfulness
    Obesity
    Recovery
    Social Media
    Sscm
    The Redleaf Practice
    Treatment
    Weight Loss

    RSS Feed

    The Redleaf Practice

    Promote Your Page Too
Chris Thornton & Associates. The Redleaf Practice. 
Photo used under Creative Commons from Pai Shih